[1]龚 慧,姚 敏,王 丽,等.改进RAGA-PPC模型在河湖水质评价及应急监测中的应用[J].江苏水利,2019,(09):5-8+13.
　GONG Hui,YAO Min,WANG Li,et al.Application of improved RAGA-PPC model in water quality assessment and emergency monitoring of rivers and lakes[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2019,(09):5-8+13.
点击复制

改进RAGA-PPC模型在河湖水质评价及应急监测中的应用()
分享到：

《江苏水利》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年09期
页码:
5-8+13
栏目:
水生态与环境
出版日期:
2019-10-11

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of improved RAGA-PPC model in water quality assessment and emergency monitoring of rivers and lakes
文章编号:
1007-7839(2019)09-0005-04
作者:
龚 慧1;  姚 敏2;  王 丽3;  吴荣荣1
1.江苏省水文水资源勘测局常州分局, 江苏 常州 213000; 2.江苏省水文水资源勘测局, 江苏 南京 210000; 3.鲁南煤化工研究院, 山东 济宁 272000
Author(s):
GONG Hui1;  YAO Min2;  WANG Li3;  WU Rongrong1
1.Changzhou Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau of Jiangsu Province, Changzhou 213022, Jiangsu; 2.Jiangsu Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu; 3.Lunan Coal Chemical Industry Research Institute, Jining 272000, Shandong
关键词:
水质评价;  应急监测;  RAGA-PPC模型;  水质等级;  模拟精度
Keywords:
water quality assessment;  emergency monitoring;  the RAGA-PPC model;  water quality level;  simulation accuracy
分类号:
X824
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为得出应用于河湖水质评价和应急监测中的标准模型,本文基于RAGA-PPC模型对滆湖水质进行了评价,并对5种不同水质指标数值进行了模拟,结果表明:该模型按照投影追踪的原理,将水质等级分为了5个等级,滆湖3个区域核心区、缓冲区和开发控制利用区的水质分别属于Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级和Ⅱ级,结论与实测值基本一致,而基于该模型对水质指标进行模拟结果可知,模型模拟结果的误差较小,与实测值的一致性较高,表明模型模拟精度较高,验证了模型在水质评价与应急监测中的先进性和科学性。
Abstract:
In order to obtain the standard model applied in river water quality assessment and emergency monitoring, the water quality of Gehu based on RAGA-PPC model was evaluated, and the values of five different water quality indicators were simulated.The results showed that the model was divided into five grades according to the principle of projection tracking.The water quality of the three regional core areas, buffer zones and development control utilization areas of Gehu belonged to Grade II, Grade III and Grade II respectively.The measured values were basically the same.The error of the model simulation results was small, and the consistency with the measured values was high.It indicated that the model had high simulation accuracy, which verified the advanced and scientific nature of the model in water quality assessment and emergency monitoring.

参考文献/References:

[1] Lau S S S, Lane S N.Biological and chemical factors-influencing shallow lake eut rophication: a long-term study[J].The Science of the Total Environment, 2002, 288:167-181.
[2] 刘国东, 黄川友, 丁晶.水质综合评价的人工神经网络模型[J].中国环境科学, 1998, 18(6):514-517.
[3] Zhou M, Shen Z, Yu R.Responses of a coastal phytoplankton community to increased nut rient inputf rom the Changjiang(Yangtze)River[J].Continental Shelf Research, 2008, 28:1483-1489.
[4] 王宏伟, 张伟, 杨丽坤, 等.中国河流健康评价体系[J].河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 31(6):669-672.
[5] 朱剑锋.淀浦河水体中氨氮、总氮和总磷污染变化趋势及相关性分析[J].北方环境, 2013(6):155-159.
[6] 宋述军, 周万村.沱江流域地表水水质的模糊综合评价[J].水土保持研究, 2007, 14(6):128-130+134.
[7] 徐晨光, 艾尼瓦尔·艾买提, 杜青辉.基于SPA和信息熵的可变模糊集水质评价方法[J].人民黄河, 2013, 35(6):56-58.
[8] 卢文喜, 李迪, 张蕾, 等.基于层次分析法的模糊综合评价在水质评价中的应用[J].节水灌溉, 2011,(3):43-46.
[9] 曹宇峰, 林春梅, 孙霞.模糊数学法在海洋水质评价中的应用[J].海洋技术, 2011, 30(2):118-122.
[10] 杨咪, 屈文岗, 钱会.基于熵权的贝叶斯模型及其在水质评价中的应用[J].灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(1):1-7.
[11] 金菊良, 杨晓华, 丁晶.基于实数编码的加速遗传算法[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2000, 32(4):20-24.

相似文献/References:

[1]尹子龙,陆晓平,翁松干,等.固城湖底栖动物群落结构及水质生态评价[J].江苏水利,2018,(11):14.
　YIN Zilong,LU Xiaoping,WENG Songgan,et al.Ecological assessment of zoobenthos community structure and water quality in Gucheng Lake[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2018,(09):14.
[2]郭海军,王欣,王逸飞,等.入海河口水质评价标准分析[J].江苏水利,2022,(04):62.
　GUO Haijun,WANG Xin,WANG Yifei,et al.Analysis on water quality evaluation standard of the estuary into the sea[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2022,(09):62.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-01-14
作者简介:龚慧(1982—),女,硕士,主要从事水文水资源相关工作。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-15