[1]王金娥,李 恺.海绵城市中不同类型河流的健康评价及修复策略[J].江苏水利,2021,(09):35-42.
 WANG Jin'e,LI Kai.Health assessment and restoration strategies for rivers of different types in sponge cities[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2021,(09):35-42.
点击复制

海绵城市中不同类型河流的健康评价及修复策略()
分享到:

《江苏水利》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年09期
页码:
35-42
栏目:
水生态与环境
出版日期:
2021-09-27

文章信息/Info

Title:
Health assessment and restoration strategies for rivers of different types in sponge cities
文章编号:
1007-7839(2021)09-0035-08
作者:
王金娥1 李 恺2
(1.无锡市新吴区排水管理中心, 江苏 无锡 214028; 2.河海大学水文水资源学院, 江苏 南京 210098)
Author(s):
WANG Jin'e1 LI Kai2
(1.Xinwu District Drainage Management Center of Wuxi City, Wuxi 214028, China; 2.College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)
关键词:
河流生态系统 生态健康评价 城市河流 海绵城市
Keywords:
river ecosystem ecological health evaluation urban rivers sponge city
分类号:
R735.3+5; R363.1+4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
研究选取无锡市新吴区作为海绵城市模型,对城市内河—伯渎港、半成市内河—张塘河及自然河道—亲水河3类不同类型的河流,从河流的形态结构、水动力、水质状况、水生生物、堤防工程状况、岸线利用管理状况、居民满意状况、供水水量状况这8个方面展开分析,综合计算12项水文、水质、水生态和公众意见的指标系数,评估河流的健康情况,为建设“海绵城市”实践中对河湖系统的生态健康开展评估提供了参考依据。
Abstract:
Xinwu District of Wuxi City was selected as a sponge city model to analyze three different types of rivers, namely, urban inland river-Bodu Port, semi-urban inland river-Zhangtang river and natural river-hydrophilic river from eight aspects, namely, river morphology, hydrodynamic force, water quality, aquatic organisms, embankment engineering, shoreline utilization and management, residents' satisfaction and water supply. The 12 indicators of hydrology, water quality, aquatic ecology and public opinion were comprehensively calculated to assess the health of rivers, which provided a reference for the ecological health assessment of river-lake system in the construction of "sponge city".

参考文献/References:

[1] CHAN F K S,GRIFFITHS J A,HIGGITT D,et al. “Sponge City” in China—a breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context [J]. Land Use Policy,2018,76(4):772-778.
[2] TOWNSEND C R. Concepts in river ecology:pattern and process in thecatchment hierarchy [J]. Large Rivers,1996,10(1/2/3/4):3-21.
[3] RANDRUP T B,BUIJS A,KONIJNENDIJK C C,et al. Moving beyond the nature-based solutions discourse:introducing nature-based thinking [J]. Urban Ecosystems,2020,1(2):1-8.
[4] 刘合拴. 海绵城市理论及其在城市规划中的实践构想 [J]. 中华建设,2015,127(12):86-87.
[5] HE B J,ZHU J,ZHAO D X,et al. Co-benefits approach:Opportunities for implementing sponge city and urban heat island mitigation [J]. Land Use Policy,2019,86(2):147-157.
[6] 吴阿娜,杨凯,车越,等. 河流健康状况的表征及其评价 [J]. 水科学进展,2005,25(4):602-608.
[7] 赵衡,闫旭,王富强,等. 基于PSR模型的三门峡库区湿地生态系统健康评价[J]. 水资源保护,2020,36(4):21-25.
[8] 王建平. 海绵城市建设与城市水污染治理职责:以我国《环境保护法》第2条效用性为视角 [J]. 江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(5):66-70.
[9] 高峰. 建设海绵城市 还水于自然 [J]. 绿色中国,2015( 22):51-52.
[10] ROUX D J. Strategies used to Guide the Design and Implementation of a National River Monitoring Programme in South Africa [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2001,69(2):131-158.
[11] 何梁,陈艳,陈俊贤. 河流健康评价研究现状与展望 [J]. 人民珠江,2013,34(6):1-4.
[12] 文伏波,韩其为,许炯心,等. 河流健康的定义与内涵 [J]. 水科学进展,2007,6(1):140-150.
[13] LI L,COLLINS A M,CHESHMEHZANGI A,et al. Identifying enablers and barriers to the implementation of the green infrastructure for urban flood management:A comparative analysis of the UK and China [J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2020,54(5):1267-1270.
[14] 杨文慧,严忠民,吴建华. 河流健康评价的研究进展 [J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版),2005(6):5-9.
[15] 陈静生. 河流水质全球变化研究若干问题 [J]. 环境化学,1992,7(2):45-53.
[16] ROGERS K,BIGGS H. Integrating indicators,endpoints and value systems in strategic management of the rivers of the Kruger National Park [J]. Freshwater Biology,1999,41(2):439-451.
[17] 董哲仁. 河流保护的发展阶段及思考 [J]. 中国水利,2004(17):16-17,32-35.
[18] RAVEN P J,HOLMES N T H,NAURA M,et al. Using river habitat survey for environmental assessment and catchment planning in the UK [J]. Hydrobiologia,2000,149(72):359-367.
[19] LADSON A R,WHITE L J,DOOLAN J A,et al. Development and testing of an Index of Stream Condition for waterway management in Australia [J]. Freshwater Biology,1999,41(2):234-258.
[20] 刘恒,涂敏. 对国外河流健康问题的初步认识 [J]. 中国水利,2005(4):19-22.
[21] 金旸. 基于GIS的县(市、区)生态环境功能区划及管理方法研究 [D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2012.
[22] 耿雷华,刘恒,钟华平,等. 健康河流的评价指标和评价标准 [J]. 水利学报,2006,22(3):253-258.
[23] KLEYNHANS C J. A qualitative procedure for the assessment of the habitat integrity status of the Luvuvhu River(Limpopo system,South Africa)[J]. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health,1996,5(1):45-61.
[24] 梁启震,张现宝,胡润停. 城市内河的问题及其治理措施 [J]. 河南水利与南水北调,2015(14):137-138.
[25] WANG Y,LIU X,HUANG M,et al. Received vs. given:Willingness to pay for sponge city program from a perceived value perspective [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,256(3):1204-1279.
[26] 李国英. 黄河治理的终极目标是“维持黄河健康生命” [J]. 人民黄河,2004,20(1):1-2,46.
[27] DENG H,WANG Q,CAI Q. Watershed ecology—New discipline,new idea and new approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,1998,6(3):114-135.
[28] NGUYEN T T,NGO H H,GUO W,et al. Implementation of a specific urban water management-Sponge City [J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,652(1):147-162.
[29] LEROY P N,DAVID A J,BAIN M B,et al. The natural flow regime [J]. Bioence,1997,12(11):769-784.
[30] Ward J V. The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems [J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society,1989,8(1):23-45.
[31] 高永胜. 河流健康生命评价与修复技术研究 [D]. 北京:中国水利水电科学研究院,2006.
[32] 刘晓燕. 构建黄河健康生命的指标体系 [J]. 中国水利,2005,11(21):30-34.
[33] 赵彦伟,杨志峰,姚长青. 黄河健康评价与修复基本框架 [J]. 水土保持学报,2005,9(5):133-136,175.
[34] 苏辉东,贾仰文,牛存稳,等. 河流健康评价指标与权重分配的统计分析[J]. 水资源保护,2019,35(6):138-144.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-01-06
作者简介:王金娥(1984—),女,工程师,本科,研究方向为水资源管理。E-mail:njsljwje@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-09-27