[1]闻余华,白 丹,孙晓凡.句容河警戒水位代表站设置问题研究[J].江苏水利,2019,(09):26-30.
　WEN Yuhua,BAI Dan,SUN Xiaofan.Study on the establishment of representative station of warning water level in Jurong River[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2019,(09):26-30.
点击复制

句容河警戒水位代表站设置问题研究()
分享到：

《江苏水利》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年09期
页码:
26-30
栏目:
水文水资源
出版日期:
2019-10-11

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the establishment of representative station of warning water level in Jurong River
文章编号:
1007-7839(2019)09-0026-05
作者:
闻余华1;  白 丹2;  孙晓凡2
1.江苏省水文水资源勘测局, 江苏 南京 210029; 2.河海大学, 江苏 南京 210098
Author(s):
WEN Yuhua1;  BAI Dan2;  SUN Xiaofan2
1.Jiangsu Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu; 2.Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu
关键词:
句容河;  警戒水位;  赤山闸;  水位差
Keywords:
Jurong River;  warning water level;  Chishan gate;  water level difference
分类号:
TV11
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
针对赤山闸(下)水位能否代表句容河水位进行分析探讨。首先选取赤山闸(上)、赤山闸(下)和前垾村3个代表站,对其历史特征水位进行了对比分析,结果表明无论是汛期各月多年平均水位还是历史最高水位,赤山闸上下游水位差明显,达0.76～0.96 m,而赤山闸(下)与前垾村站水位差基本一致,介于0.01～0.04 m。其次选取2015～2018年4场典型洪水,对其洪水过程进行了对比分析,结果表明在赤山闸开闸期间,赤山闸(下)与赤山闸(上)水位接近,赤山闸(下)与前垾村水位差明显,最大达1.97 m,赤山闸关闸期间,赤山闸(下)与前垾村站水位基本一致,水位差为-0.02～0.05 m。通过分析,建议句容河警戒水位设置采用前垾村站代表站更加合理。
Abstract:
Whether the under-gate water level of the Chishan Gate could represent the Jurong River water level was analyzed and discussed.Firstly, three representative stations of Chishan Gate(up-gate)station, Chishan Gate(down-gate)station and Qianhan Village station were selected, and the characteristics of its historical level was compared and analyzed.The results showed that both the average water level in flood season months and the highest level for many years, the level difference of upstream and downstream water level of Chishan Gate was obvious, which was up to 0.76 ～ 0.96 m, while the the level difference of Chishan Gate(down-gate)station and Qianhan Village station was basically the same, ranging from 0.01 to 0.04 m.Secondly, four typical floods from 2015 to 2018 were selected and the flood process was compared and analyzed.The results showed that during the opening of the Chishan Gate, the water level of the Chishan Gate(down-gate)and the Chishan Gate(up-gate)was close.The water level difference between the Chishan Gate(down-gate)and Qianhan Village was obvious, and the maximum was 1.97 m.During the closing of Chishan Gate, the water level of the Chishan Gate(down-gate)and Qianhan Village Station was basically the same, and the water level difference was -0.02～0.05 m.Therefore, it's suggested that using the Qianhan Village Station representative station as the Jurong River warning water level setting was more reasonable.

参考文献/References:

[1] 闻余华, 陈靓.秦淮河流域“2007·7”暴雨洪水分析[J].人民长江, 2008(5):20-21+24.
[2] 郑恩才, 佘礼晔, 张亚男.秦淮河的历史变迁[J].江苏水利, 2016(5):60-62+72.
[3] 刘朗, 潘宗龙.句容河城区段水环境整治工程防洪评价分析[J].吉林水利, 2019(1):22-25.
[4] 杨春光.浅谈赤山湖滞洪区建设规划思路[J].江苏水利, 2007(12):17-19+21.
[5] 陈康昕.秦淮河流域洪水的治理问题[J].江苏水利, 1992(3):31-36.

相似文献/References:

[1]周海天,夏 飞.废黄河中山河闸站警戒水位调整分析[J].江苏水利,2020,(02):38.
　ZHOU Haitian,XIA Fei.Analysis on the adjustment of warning water level of Zhongshan River Gate Station on the Old-yellow River[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2020,(09):38.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-04-23
作者简介:闻余华(1965—),男,硕士,教授级高工,主要从事水文水资源及水文情报预报工作。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-15