[1]华庆莉,曹秋迪,沈菊琴,等.流域生态补偿主客体识别方法比较研究——以行政区为研究对象[J].江苏水利,2020,(12):22-26.
　HUA Qingli,CAO Qiudi,SHEN Juqin,et al.Comparative study on subject-object identification methods of watershed ecological compensation——taking administrative regions as the research object[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2020,(12):22-26.
点击复制

流域生态补偿主客体识别方法比较研究——以行政区为研究对象()
分享到：

《江苏水利》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年12期
页码:
22-26
栏目:
水生态与环境
出版日期:
2020-12-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study on subject-object identification methods of watershed ecological compensation——taking administrative regions as the research object
文章编号:
1007-7839(2020)12-0022-05
作者:
华庆莉1;  曹秋迪2;  沈菊琴3;  高 鑫4;  孙付华3
1.江苏省水利防汛物资储备中心, 江苏 南京 210029; 2.江苏省太湖水利规划设计研究院, 江苏 苏州 215106; 3.河海大学 农业科学与工程学院, 江苏 南京 210098; 4.河海大学 商学院, 江苏 南京 211100
Author(s):
HUA Qingli1;  CAO Qiudi2;  SHEN Juqin3;  GAO Xin4;  SUN Fuhua3
1.Jiangsu Provincial Water Conservancy and Flood Control Material Reserve Center, Nanjing 210029, China; 2.Jiangsu Taihu Planning and Design Institute of Water Resources Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215106, China; 3.College of Agricultural Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 4.Business College, Hohai university, Nanjing 211100, China
关键词:
流域生态补偿;  主客体识别;  水足迹;  生态系统服务价值;  行政区
Keywords:
watershed ecological compensation;  identification of subject and object;  water footprint;  value of ecosystem services;  administrative region
分类号:
X171
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
以流域范围内的行政区为研究对象,创新的将水足迹法、生态系统服务价值法引入到流域生态补偿主客体识别领域,对比并分析了流域地理位置识别法、水足迹法、生态系统服务价值法在识别流域生态补偿主客体的优缺点与使用范围。在此基础上,提出流域生态补偿主客体识别方法选择与应用的相关建议。
Abstract:
Taking the administrative regions within the river basin as the research object, the water footprint method, the ecosystem services value method were innovatively introduced in the field of subject-object identification of watershed ecological compensation. The advantages, disadvantages and application range of watershed geographic location identification, water footprint identification and ecosystem service value identification were compared and analyzed. On this basis, some suggestions on the selection and application of the subject-object identification methods of watershed ecological compensation were put forward.

参考文献/References:

[1] HONG L, FANG L, QIAN Z, et al. The quantitative analysis of ecological compensation responsibility in watershed [J]. Energy Procedia, 2012, 16(Part B): 1324-1331.
[2] FU Y, DU X, RUAN B, et al. Agro-ecological compensation of watershed based on emergy [J]. Water Science Technology, 2017, 76(10): 2830-2841.
[3] GAO X, SHEN J, HE W, et al. Multilevel governments' decision-making process and its influencing factors in watershed ecological compensation [J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(7)(1990):28.
[4] 王金南, 刘桂环, 文一惠. 以横向生保护补偿促进改善流域水环境质量——《关于加快建立流域上下游横向生态保护补偿机制的指导意见》解读 [J]. 环境保护, 2017, 7(45):13-18.
[5] 马永喜, 王娟丽, 王晋. 基于生态环境产权界定的流域生态补偿标准研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8):1325-1336.
[6] 卢卓建. 基于排污权交易的东江流域生态补偿研究 [J]. 现代经济信息, 2017(16):9-11.
[7] ZHANG C, ANADON L D. A multi-regional input–output analysis of domestic virtual water trade and provincial water footprint in China [J]. Ecological Economics, 2014, 100(2):159-172.
[8] 刘红光, 陈敏, 唐志鹏. 基于灰水足迹的长江经济带水资源生态补偿标准研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(11):2553-2563.
[9] AHMED M T. Millennium ecosystem assessment [J]. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 2002, 9(4):219-220.
[10] TACCONI L. Redefining payments for environmental services [J]. Ecological Economics, 2012, 73(1727):29-36.
[11] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, GROOT R D, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. World Environment, 1997, 25(1):3-15.
[12] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-08-10
基金项目:江苏省水利科技项目(2018034)
作者简介:华庆莉(1970—),女,会计师,本科,研究方向为水利经济、防汛物资储备管理、资源会计等。Email:849162124@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-20