[1]夏玉林,何晓静,汪姗,等.“幸福淮河”评价指标构建[J].江苏水利,2022,(06):12-15+21.
 XIA Yulin,HE Xiaojing,WANG Shan,et al.Construction of evaluation indicators for“Happy Huai River”[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2022,(06):12-15+21.
点击复制

“幸福淮河”评价指标构建()
分享到:

《江苏水利》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
12-15+21
栏目:
水文水资源
出版日期:
2022-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction of evaluation indicators for“Happy Huai River”
文章编号:
1007-7839(2022)06-0012-0004
作者:
夏玉林1何晓静1汪姗1卞锦宇2
(1.江苏省水文水资源勘测局常州分局,江苏 常州 213002;2.南京水利科学研究院水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室,江苏 南京 210029)
Author(s):
XIA Yulin1 HE Xiaojing1 WANG Shan1 BIAN Jinyu2
(1.Changzhou Branch of Jiangsu Province Hydrology and Water Resources Investigation Bureau, Changzhou 213002, China;2.Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Key Laboratory of Water Resource and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing 210029, China)
关键词:
幸福河淮河评价指标
Keywords:
happy river Huai River evaluation indicator
分类号:
TV213.4
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
基于新时期治水思路,明晰“幸福淮河”评价指标构建的侧重点及要素。以淮河流域为评价对象,以“目标层—准测层—指标层”为框架,从防洪保安全、优质水资源、健康水生态、宜居水环境、先进水文化以及智慧水治理6个方面确定评价准则,针对6个准则总共选取35个指标,以此构建“幸福淮河”评价指标。构建的评价指标从水安全、水生态、水环境、水文化等不同维度及不同深度反映了淮河建设进展情况,河流自身需求与经济社会发展的平衡状况,评价指标具有系统性、针对性、实用性,可为淮河管理建设提供技术支撑。
Abstract:
Based on the idea of water management in the new era, the key points in evaluation indicator construction for “Happy Huai River” are clarified. The Huai River Basin is taken as the evaluation object, and the evaluation systems is based on the framework of “goal-criteria-indicator”. The evaluation criteria are determined from 6 aspects of flood control and safety, high-quality water resources, healthy water ecology, livable water environment, advanced water culture and smart water governance, and a total of 35 indicators are selected for the 6 criteria to construct the “Happy Huai River” evaluation indicators. The evaluation indicators reflect the progress of Huai River from different dimensions and depths such as water security, water ecology, water environment, and water culture, and the balance between the river’s own needs and economic and social development. The evaluation indicators are systematic, targeted and practical. It can provide technical support for the management and construction of the Huai River.

参考文献/References:

[1]王建华,翟正丽,桑学锋,等. 水资源承载力指标体系及评判准则研究[J]. 水利学报,2017,48(9):1023-1029.
[2]左其亭,郝明辉,姜龙,等. 幸福河评价体系及其应用[J]. 水科学进展,2021,32(1):45-58.
[3]贡力,田洁,靳春玲,等. 基于ERG需求模型的幸福河综合评价[J]. 水资源保护,2022,38(3):25-33.
[4]左其亭,郝明辉,马军霞,等. 幸福河的概念、内涵及判断准则[J]. 人民黄河,2020,42(1):1-5.
[5]陈茂山,王建平,乔根平. 关于“幸福河”内涵及评价指标体系的认识与思考[J]. 水利发展研究,2020,20(1):3-5.
[6]谷树忠. 关于建设幸福河湖的若干思考[J]. 中国水利,2020(6):13-14.
[7]韩宇平,夏帆. 基于需求层次论的幸福河评价研究及应用[J]. 南水北调与水利科技,2020(1):13.
[8]幸福河研究课题组. 幸福河内涵要义及指标体系探析[J]. 中国水利,2020(23):1-4.
[9]王子悦,徐慧,黄丹姿,等. 基于熵权物元模型的长三角幸福河层次评价[J]. 水资源保护,2021(1):9.
[10]刘冬顺. 牢记殷切嘱托书写新时代淮河保护治理新篇章[J]. 中国水利,2020(24):51-52.
[11]陆海田. 健康淮河评价指标体系研究[J]. 治淮,2018(5):9-10.
[12]韩春华. 沙颍河流域河流健康评价与水资源优化配置研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学,2018.
[13]谢悦. 淮河中上游河流健康评价指标体系与方法研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2017.
[14]刘国平,李开峰. 淮河流域防汛抗旱减灾体系建设与成就[J]. 中国防汛抗旱,2019,29(10):54-60.
[15]贾利,郁丹英,张晓玲. 淮河流域水生态系统现状存在问题及保护对策[J]. 治淮,2015(1):22-24.
[16]水利部淮河水利委员会. 淮河片水资源公报[R]. 蚌埠:水利部淮河水利委员会,2018.

相似文献/References:

[1]戴 浩.推进淮河生态经济带实施引领流域生态文明建设[J].江苏水利,2019,(增刊2):18.
 DAI Hao.and lead the construction of ecological civilization in the river basin[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2019,(06):18.
[2]李晗宇,邓 涯,张 维,等.淮河入海水道泄洪能力与洪泽湖运行水位关系研究[J].江苏水利,2021,(12):15.
 LI Hanyu,DENG Ya,ZHANG Wei,et al.Research on relationship between flood discharge capacity of Huaihe River waterway to sea and operating water level of Hongze Lake[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2021,(06):15.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-01-04
作者简介:夏玉林(1981—),男,高级工程师,主要从事水文水资源、水环境等方面的工作。E-mail: 39036296@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-06-15