[1]丁睿,缪璐,林燕.城市骨干河道湿式清淤实践与探索[J].江苏水利,2024,(12):13-15,19.
DING Rui,MIAO Lu,LIN Yan.Practice and exploration of wet dredging of urban backbone rivers: taking the Yunliang River in Nanjing as an example[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2024,(12):13-15,19.
点击复制
城市骨干河道湿式清淤实践与探索(
)
《江苏水利》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]
- 卷:
-
- 期数:
-
2024年12期
- 页码:
-
13-15,19
- 栏目:
-
水生态与环境
- 出版日期:
-
2024-12-15
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Practice and exploration of wet dredging of urban backbone rivers: taking the Yunliang River in Nanjing as an example
- 文章编号:
-
1007-7839（2024）12-0013-0003
- 作者:
-
丁睿1; 缪璐2; 林燕3
-
（1. 南京市麒麟科技创新园（生态科技城）开发建设管理委员会，江苏 南京 211135；2. 南京市江宁区水务局，江苏 南京 211100；3. 泰州市城区河道管理处，江苏 泰州 225300）
- Author(s):
-
DING Rui1; MIAO Lu2; LIN Yan3
-
（1. Nanjing Qilin Science and Technology Innovation Park （Ecological Science and Technology City） Development and Construction Management Committee, Nanjing 211135, China；2. Jiangning District Water Affairs Bureau, Nanjing 211100, China；3. Taizhou Urban River Management Office, Taizhou 225300, China）
-
- 关键词:
-
运粮河; 淤泥问题; 湿式清淤; 生态治理
- Keywords:
-
Yunliang River; silt problem; wet dredging; ecological management
- 分类号:
-
X52
- 文献标志码:
-
B
- 摘要:
-
近年来，部分城市河道因河底淤泥问题导致水体黑臭、水质变差，居民生活环境受到了严重影响。与小型河道普遍采用的干式清淤法和水力清淤法相比，城市骨干河道清淤更加复杂，探索不断流、不打围堰、不停航、清理淤泥量大的新型清淤方式势在必行。南京市运粮河清淤在南京主城区首次采用湿式清淤方案，通过对方案可行性和工程量的计算，结果表明相比于传统的干式清淤，湿式清淤方案是生态治理南京运粮河水质问题的有效方案，具有清淤效果好、施工噪音小、二次污染小等优点。
- Abstract:
-
In recent years, some urban rivers have been severely affected by the problem of silt at the bottom of the river, resulting in black and odorous water bodies and deteriorating water quality, which has had a serious impact on the living environment of residents. Compared with the commonly used dry dredging method and hydraulic dredging method for small rivers, the dredging of urban backbone rivers is more complex. It is imperative to explore new dredging methods that can ensure continuous flow, avoid cofferdam construction, maintain navigation without interruption, and handle a large amount of silt. For the first time in the main urban area of Nanjing, a wet dredging scheme was adopted for the dredging of the Yunliang River. Through the calculation of the feasibility and engineering quantity of the scheme, the results showed that compared with the traditional dry dredging, the wet dredging scheme is an effective solution for ecological governance of the water quality problems of the Yunliang River in Nanjing. It has the advantages of good dredging effect, low construction noise, and low secondary pollution.
参考文献/References:
[1]赵博文. 小河道清淤工程中的不同施工方案[J]. 内蒙古水利，2020（2）：62-63.
[2]张艳. 河道湿式清淤及淤泥处理技术探析[J]. 黑龙江水利科技，2020，48（6）：150-152.
[3]陈正梁. 河道环保清淤工程施工技术研究[J]. 资源节约与环保，2020（7）：33.
[4]单玉书，沈爱春，刘畅. 太湖底泥清淤疏浚问题探讨[J]. 中国水利，2018（23）：11-13.
[5]郭军峰，方文超. 防洪治理中沟渠清淤疏浚方式比较[J]. 河南水利与南水北调，2024，53（4）：36-37.
[6]韩冰，李云龙，刘艳亭. 简析三种挖泥船在疏浚工程中的适用性[J]. 港口航道与近海工程，2024，61（2）：146-150.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
收稿日期：2024-07-26
作者简介：丁睿（1986—），男，工程师，硕士，主要从事城市水利工程建设管理工作。E-mail: 570949041@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update:
2024-12-15