[1]王红杰,吴江滨,熊盼,等.水行政执法中包容审慎监管方式的探讨[J].江苏水利,2026,(06):69-72.
WANG Hongjie,WU Jiangbin,XIONG Pan,et al.Discussion on the inclusive and prudent supervision mode in water administrative law enforcement[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2026,(06):69-72.
点击复制
水行政执法中包容审慎监管方式的探讨(
)
《江苏水利》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]
- 卷:
-
- 期数:
-
2026年06期
- 页码:
-
69-72
- 栏目:
-
水利工程管理
- 出版日期:
-
2026-07-02
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Discussion on the inclusive and prudent supervision mode in water administrative law enforcement
- 文章编号:
-
1007-7839（2026）06-0069-0004
- 作者:
-
王红杰; 吴江滨; 熊盼; 段圣泼; 陈鹤林; 赵齐
-
（南京市水务监管保障中心，江苏 南京 210029）
- Author(s):
-
WANG Hongjie; WU Jiangbin; XIONG Pan; DUAN Shengpo; CHEN Helin; ZHAO Qi
-
（Nanjing Water Administration Supervision and Support Center, Nanjing 210029, China）
-
- 关键词:
-
包容审慎监管; 不予行政处罚; 水行政执法
- Keywords:
-
inclusive and prudent supervision; no administrative penalty; water administrative law enforcement
- 分类号:
-
DF31
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
包容审慎监管是转变执法理念、改革执法方式、优化营商环境的重要举措。为贯彻落实行政处罚法和法治政府建设相关规定要求，水行政执法领域陆续制定出台了水事违法行为不予行政处罚清单及配套适用规则体系。立足包容审慎监管的执法背景，系统阐述了水行政执法包容免罚清单制定原则和核心要求，对多年度南京市包容免罚实施情况进行统计分析，深度剖析免罚清单在应用过程中需要精准把握的要素构成和界定标准，进而提出完善清单实施的对策建议，旨在进一步优化水行政执法包容审慎监管方式，全面提升水行政执法质量与效能。
- Abstract:
-
Inclusive and prudent regulation is a crucial measure for transforming law enforcement concepts, reforming law enforcement methods, and optimizing the business environment. To implement the relevant provisions and requirements of the Administrative Penalty Law and the construction of a law-based government, the water administrative law enforcement sector has successively formulated and issued lists of non-imposition of administrative penalties for water-related illegal acts, as well as a supporting system of applicable rules. Based on the law enforcement context of inclusive and prudent regulation, this paper systematically expounds the formulation principles and core requirements of the inclusive non-penalty lists for water administrative law enforcement, conducts a statistical analysis on the implementation of inclusive non-penalty measures in Nanjing over multiple years, and deeply dissects the constituent elements and definitional criteria that need to be accurately grasped in the application of the non-penalty lists. Furthermore, it puts forward countermeasures and suggestions for improving the implementation of the lists, aiming to further optimize the inclusive and prudent regulatory approach in water administrative law enforcement and comprehensively enhance the quality and efficiency of water administrative law enforcement.
参考文献/References:
[1]李志强. 以包容审慎监管助力优化民营经济发展环境——以制度建设为分析视角[J]. 理论观察，2024（11）：102-107.
[2]李向阳，张蔚怡，周红珠，等. 卫生行政执法优化营商环境的路径研究[J]. 中国公共卫生管理，2024，40（1）：100-103.
[3]廖彩舜. 包容审慎环境执法的规制模式和制度优化[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，2024，34（11）：130-137.
[4]邵胜达. 行政执法包容审慎监管的探索与实践——以温州市鹿城区为例[J]. 宁波经济（三江论坛），2024（5）：34-38.
[5]郭金良. 数字金融包容审慎监管法治论[J]. 北方法学，2025，19（2）：21-38.
[6]朱俊，贾康乐. 论免罚清单制度的功能优化[J]. 江西警察学院学报，2025（4）：55-64.
[7]李会勋，解入炫. 首违不罚制度现状及完善路径探析[J]. 辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报，2025（5）：91-98.
[8]刘丽，邓语柠. 我国道路交通安全领域“首违不罚”制度的适用及其规范[J]. 湖南警察学院学报，2024，36（5）：102-109.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
收稿日期：2026-03-30
作者简介：王红杰（1971—），男，本科，主要从事水法律法规及行政执法研究。E-mail:854930001@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update:
2026-06-01