[1]郦息明.水生态文明城市建设现状评价研究[J].江苏水利,2017,(09):5-9.
　LI Ximing.Study on the present situation evaluation of water ecological civilization city construction — Taking Lianyungang city as an example[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2017,(09):5-9.
点击复制

水生态文明城市建设现状评价研究()
分享到：

《江苏水利》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2017年09期
页码:
5-9
栏目:
生态与环境
出版日期:
2017-09-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the present situation evaluation of water ecological civilization city construction — Taking Lianyungang city as an example
文章编号:
1007-7839（2017）09-0010-05
作者:
郦息明
江苏省水文水资源勘测局连云港分局，江苏 连云港 222004
Author(s):
LI Ximing
Lianyungang Hydrology and Water Resources Investigation Bureau of Jiangsu Province，Lianyungang 222004，Jiangsu
关键词:
水生态文明; 现状评价; 评价指标; 评价标准
Keywords:
water ecological civilization; present situation evaluation; evaluation index; evaluation standard
分类号:
X322
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
以连云港市为研究对象，构建了包括水安全、水环境、水生态、水管理和水文化等5个方面、20 项指标的水生态文明城市评价指标体系，对2015 年连云港市水生态文明城市建设现状进行了评价。结果显示，总分77.8 分，其中水安全12.5 分（实现度83.7%，下同）、水环境8.3 分（55.2%）、水生态23.5 分（78.3%）、水管理20.4 分（84.1%）、水文化13.4 分（89.3%），整体尚未达到水生态文明城市标准。水安全、水管理、水文化等方面相对较好，水环境和水生态方面是连云港市水生态文明建设的短板，将是未来建设的重点。
Abstract:
Taking Lianyungang city as the research object, the evaluation index system of water ecological civilization city which included water security, water environment, water ecology, water management and water culture in 5 aspects and 20 indicators was established, and the present situation of water ecological civilization of Lianyungang city in 2015 was evaluated.The results showed that the total score was 77.8 points, of which the water security score was 12.5 points (achieved 83.7%, the same below), the water environment score was 8.3 points (55.2%), the water ecological score was 23.5 points (78.3%), the water management score was 20.4 points (84.1%), and the water culture score was 13.4 points (89.3%).The whole system had not yet reached the standard of water ecological civilization city.Water security, water management, water culture and other aspects were relatively good.However, water environment and water ecology were weakness in the construction of Lianyungang water ecological civilization, which would be the f ocus of future construction.

参考文献/References:

[1] 石秋池.《水生态文明城市建设评价导则》解读[J].水资源保护，2015，32（5）:154-154.
[2] 汪伦焰，袁杰，李娜，等.基于物元可拓模型的水生态文明城市建设评价——以许昌市为例[J].人民长江，2015，47（18）:18-21.
[3] 刘海娇，黄继文，仕玉治.滨州水生态文明城市建设现状评价[J].山东水利，2013（6）:23-24.
[4] 王富强，王雷，魏怀斌，等.郑州市水生态文明城市建设现状评价[J].南水北调与水利科技，2015（4）:639-642.
[5] 杨丰顺，徐成剑.水生态文明城市评价体系研究——以咸宁市为例[J].安徽农业科学，2014（34）:12270-12273.
[6] 黄显峰，贾永乐，方国华.基于投影寻踪法的城市水生态文明建设评价[J].水资源保护，2015，32（6）:117-122.
[7] 宋梦林，左其亭，赵钟楠，等.河南省水生态文明建设试点城市生态系统健康评价[J].南水北调与水利科技，2015，13（6）:1185-1190.
[8] 季同德，刘俊，徐慧.江苏地区水生态文明城市建设研究[J].中国农村水利水电，2014（10）:5-7.
[9] 高华，曹先玉，蔡保国.山东省水生态文明城市评价体系研究[J].中国水利，2013（10）:8-10.

相似文献/References:

[1]蔡其洋,孙永君,朱学林,等.阜宁水生态文明建设的实践与思考[J].江苏水利,2016,(09):46.
　CAI Qiyang,SUN Yongjun,ZHU Xuelin,et al.Practice and thinking about water ecological civilization construction in Funing[J].JIANGSU WATER RESOURCES,2016,(09):46.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介：郦息明（1964-），男，高级工程师，主要从事水文水资源管理工作。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-09-15